This Superheavy Atom Factory Is Pushing the Limits of the Periodic Table

This Superheavy Atom Factory Is Pushing the Limits of the Periodic Table

Inside this labyrinth of pipes and chambers,
superheavy elements are being fused into existence. This machine is part of an international hunt
to unlock the mysteries of this new class of elements that typically don’t exist here
on Earth. Pushing these element discoveries really is
pushing into models of how matter is formed in the big bang. How do we model matter? And how do we model the formation of the universe? Superheavy elements exist for a fraction of
time and are nearly impossible to catch. But understanding them could force us to reimagine
the most iconic scientific symbol of all time: the periodic table. In 1869, Russian chemist, Dmitri Mendeleev,
laid the foundations for what would become the modern periodic table. He arranged the known elements in order of
increasing atomic weight–starting with the lightest ones with the least protons and working
his way up. And as he did so, a curious pattern started
to emerge. What happened is he noticed that at regular
intervals, chemical properties were repeating themselves. Because of this periodicity in the chemistry,
he realized that there were elements at that time that had not yet been discovered but
should be there. In the following years, scientists started
isolating the elements Mendeleev predicted from various materials. Scandium was found in a hunk of euxenite,
gallium in a piece of zinc ore, and hafnium in a zirconium mineral, to name a few. The table’s design was revised and perfected
as more elements were added. But as nuclei got heavier and heavier, finding
them became a bit more complicated. When we refer to heavy elements, we’re talking
about things that have these very large nuclei that have a lot of protons in them. Above uranium, nothing exists here naturally. They have more protons in their system than
anything that we have naturally occurring. In order to continue their quest towards a
complete periodic table, scientists couldn’t just continue isolating elements from existing
materials. They had to create them. So we use what’s called a particle accelerator
or specifically a cyclotron, which is a large instrument that accelerates ions to a fraction
of the speed of light. Cyclotrons have been used to discover heavy
elements ranging from curium to plutonium. And most recently, Dr. Shaughnessy’s team
collaborated with a lab in Russia to complete the periodic table’s 7th row– the home
of the superheavies. When we make one of these new elements in
the cyclotron we really have to just add up protons. So for instance, if we wanted to look for
element 116, we could take something with 20 protons and we can take something with
96 protons, and if we can get those two nuclei to completely fuse together for even a short
time that means we have an element 116, one atom of it. These elements are very short lived they’re
not very stable, so they decay very quickly. Some superheavy elements only exist for just
milliseconds. So, in order to confirm they created one,
the team had to work backwards– sifting through the data to find the signal that told
them a heavy element was actually there. The Flerov lab in Dubna has an incredible
cyclotron that’s really a work horse. And we at Livermore have access to various
target materials. So we provided our expertise, the Russians
provided their expertise, and together discovered elements 114 through 118. While efforts to discover more elements continue,
Dr. Shaughnessy and Dr. Gates have shifted their sights to studying the ones we already
have. We know almost nothing about these superheavies,
including whether or not we’ve put them in the right place on the periodic table. Right now, when an element is discovered,
we’re putting it in the periodic table based on its number, mostly for convenience. But the periodic table, let’s remember, it
was constructed to be a living document on the chemistry of these elements. The models predict that these heavy elements
might behave unexpectedly due to something called relativistic effects. We have these big massive nuclei and what’s
happening is they’re accelerating their electrons to near relativistic speeds.They’re going
so fast that they’re being dominated by the theory of relativity. What that does is it’s changing the mass of
the electron and that’s changing how it bonds and its chemistry. So when we get to this last row of the periodic
table, what we see sometimes, is that the chemical properties down a given group may
invert or do something totally different. We believe that we have them in the right
position, but we also don’t think we’ve proven that. And so, what we did was we built FIONA to
actually prove that what we think is true, actually is true. Hooked up to the Lawrence Berkeley National
Lab’s 88 inch cyclotron, FIONA is one of the newest tools designed to study superheavy
elements. Its primary goal is to experimentally confirm
their mass numbers. But before FIONA can measure the mass, the
team needs to create a superheavy element. So we are in cave one at the Building 88 facility. The beam comes from the cyclotron, which is
right through that wall, and then it travels all the way down this line here until it reaches
our target out the other side. This is what our targets look like, or this
is three fourths of a target. We have just a couple of thousand atoms thick
of whatever our target material actually is. What we’re interested in is one nucleus from
the beam hitting one nucleus from the target and completely fusing. The problem is that doesn’t happen very often. Nuclei are very small compared to atoms, so
a nucleus is about 10,000 times smaller than the atom itself. When the beam comes in, what it actually sees
is mostly empty space. It actually passes through our target, mostly. And then very, very rarely we’ll get this
head-on collision that makes that atom that we want. Right inside this box, that’s where our elements
are made. Now our job is to find a way to separate all
that junk that we don’t want, from that one atom that we do. Everything travels through the Berkeley Gas-Filled
Separator – a machine equipped with giant magnets that bend the excess atoms away from
the superheavy the team is interested in. Then it enters stage one of FIONA. That’s all of that equipment over there. It traps it in a small volume,
and then it sends it on to stage two of FIONA. Magnetic fields then send the superheavy atom
into a specialized loop. And, it’s the specific path it takes within
that loop that tells the team its mass. FIONA’s first scientific experiment started
in June of last year. We were able to confirm that those new heavy
elements that we’ve discovered really do have the number of neutrons and protons that we
think that they do. But confirming that isn’t quite enough to
know for sure that we’ve put them in the correct place on the table– we also have
to explore their chemistries. We have atoms trapped in a cubic millimeter
of volume for a time that we pick. We can add in different gases and we can change
the amount of time we trap things for. We can look, “Does this gas react with this
atom? And if so, what does it make? We could actually learn quite a bit about
the chemistry of these new elements. And at Dr. Shaughnessy’s lab, her team is
looking into alternative methods. Here at Livermore we’re trying to develop
a way to do aqueous chemistry of 114. Hopefully this collection of data from both
the gas and aqueous phase will start to paint a more complete picture. If we do see some real shift in chemistry
we would have to rethink that last row. What does that mean for our periodic table? 150 years after its conception, the periodic
table is reaching a turning point. As Dr. Gates, Dr. Shaughnessy, and teams around
the world continue to unlock the mysteries at its borders, they’re also starting to
question just how much further those borders can be pushed. There are people who have tried to predict
where the periodic table will end.The most common number thrown about is around element
172, or 173. The issue is that the probability of making
the two nuclei come together, it gets smaller and smaller as we go up in element numbers. So with element 118 it was a very small probability
that we would make it. Now for 119 and 120 it’s even getting lower
and lower. In order to push out to heavier elements there’s
going to have to be some real shifts in technology compared to what we have now. You’re trying to answer a basic scientific
question. How many elements are there in the universe,
and what are their chemical properties? That’s something that’s interesting, regardless
of whether or not there’s any scientific applications for it. If you break down an advanced piece of technology,
a new medicine, or an energy source to its essential parts— you always end up with
the same thing: those same blocks that make up you and me and the stars in the night sky. It’s about the elements themselves. The formation of these elements alone tells
us a lot about nuclear theory and how the nucleus holds together. We’ve already changed over the decades how
we think of the nucleus. So that’s where the application is right now,
is really in just our fundamental understanding of the universe.

100 thoughts on “This Superheavy Atom Factory Is Pushing the Limits of the Periodic Table

  • how many protons can you put in a nucleus? just look at the size of a star. that's a big nucleus 🙂 when a nucleus reaches a certain temperature is will begin to lose its memory of what it was and then becomes symbiotically apart of the whole. sort of the reverse in a Bose Einstein condensate. instead of cold it is because of heat. the nucleus at a certain temp will behave as one mass with no memory to tell them what to become. imo.

  • what if when you put 140 (or whatever) protons together something happens to the higgs field?? Isnt that kinda dangerous?

  • Fcking Awesome! Best YouTube video I’ve seen in a while. Way to go LLNL! One thing they didn’t mention about the problem of creating more stable super-heavy elements is the fact that you need more and more neutrons per nuclei. So the lighter elements just can’t provide enough neutrons because if they had enough they themselves would be too unstable to make targets or accelerated ions. We somehow have to make very unstable heavy elements milli or micro seconds before colliding them to make a super heavy element. If we could pull this off then we might actually reach the island of stability and make longer lived superheavies that some have predicted to be stable for years maybe even decades.

    At that point they can be used to create technology. Who knows? maybe they will be able to open the door of quantum gravity allowing us to create propulsionless space drives and extremely power/energy dense fusion reactors. There is one person who claims that 114 has such a potential if we can make it with enough neutrons.

  • Why are their only females in this video?
    Like I don't mind seeing them but I know for a fact there are also Men there, I just think it's a weird move.

  • Really huge… Doesn't last long. Sounds like something my girlfriend said.

    I told she can't have every thing and to be happy with the one in her hand, Because she was never going to get both of them in the bush. 0_o

  • At the beginning I was thinking they should try different gases to stabilize the nucleus and at the end of the video they said that's what they are doing.

  • Have we stabilized any of the man made elements? Because if we have we can apply that science and create a sound way to stabilize other ones.

  • When they make sillicon wafers, don't they coat the silica wafers in metals using a chemical process?

    Could some of that tech be taken to use in your research? Like, fire lasers at wafers with several different layers of heaveier elements chemically etched on it. Would it produce something interesting?

  • There is no fundamental limit to the number of elements possible but for the strength of the nuclear force which decreases with distance. Eventually, atomic nuclei get so big that the radius of the nucleus is larger than the range of the strong nuclear force, and, therefore, the strong nuclear for cannot hold the nucleus together and it decays into lighter particles. If you could crank up the strength of the strong nuclear force you could create heavier and heavier stable nuclei, but you can't just turn up the strong nuclear force like a thermostat. So again, there is not fundamental, universal limit to the size of atomic nuclei, but there is a practical limit directly related to the strength and range of the strong nuclear force. Duh.

  • To crowded else I am sure nature would of made them. That is why got radiation it's to crowded for them and they come off as radiation.

  • We found out where 1/2 the women in STEM went to. Trying to birth new elements, for just a moment. Before they self destruct. I don't think you should list and element on the periodic table if you can't use it.

  • Can't make em on earth for more than a millisecond… But that doesn't mean they don't exist in the center of Jupiter, or in another galaxy where the physics are completely different.

  • Element 166 instantly decays to anti matter. ETs use a stable isotope of element 115 and bombard it with protons wich makes atons of 116 wich instantly decays to antimatter. We all know how useful antimatter could be. The fact is element 115 is so much more than just a means to produce antu matter. Such a huge element thats actually stable actually has its strong force sticking outside the atom a bit. This is where our science and ET science do not agree yet. We don't understand the relationship between the strong force and gravity yet. The ETs do and our deep black world does. We really need meditators and remote viewers to start working with scientists. We need to make ET friends. They may have a non contact polocy but if we can telepathically be friends without physical contact that may be a start. Somehow the US government came into possession of some element 115 and Bob Lazar suspects arciolically we must have found it. If we actually do work with ETs in deep black programs that would be so amazing.

  • Can you interview the guys on the project instead of these halfwit diversity hires? "Me turn knob. Box and tube collect stuff. Me usually forced to keep fire extinguisher strapped to back. Soon I have enough money for rest of sex change. Where my safety helmet?"

  • Man playing at being a God. Yeah this is going to end with a big bang of our own making. Just because we can do a thing doesn't necessarily mean we should be doing a thing. Mankind is either on the brink of becoming like God or we are on the brink of totally destroying our world. So it's all kind of exciting and kind of really scary. It's also kind of strange how far we have come in only a few hundred years and I can only imagine how far we will be in another hundred or two hundred years from now and all we will have to do is not blow our self's up to see that future. My great great grandchildren will hopefully learn from our mistakes and develop into a better human being's then what we are today. I guess only time will tell the tale and I'm kind of saddened by the fact that I will never know where all of this will lead to.

  • I like your videos, really do, but this one seems a bit dated….I read about the existence and use of atomic weight 115 sometime back in the mid 1980s…wheels are always being reinvented in science

  • I don't like the idea of us colliding particles to look for the "god" particle or recreate the big bang. We have no idea how small or big the beginning was and the universe is still expanding today as a result of the big bang so what's make them so sure they can contain the big bang in a lab?

  • My Jeep regularly does 1/10,301,538 the speed of light (in a vacuum). My Jeep can travel a fraction of the speed of light (in a vacuum).

  • My partner: you know I'm not hearing anybody I'd assume was a cis guy in this video
    Me: yeah well I guess they realized you can't trust cis guys to talk about your science stuff after that guy embarrassed the esa with his half naked lady print shirt.

    In b4 cis dudes demonstrate that can't take a joke

  • The Big Bang only happens when those who believe in it fart and release heavy particles in the process which forms in seconds causing their brains the symptoms we, the normal people, witness in them. 😉😂😉😂😉😂👀

  • you don't have to shave your hair and act like a man for us to take you seriously, doc. girls do science too in the 21st century

  • are you positive you know what you're doing with this machine, you might end up killing everyone and earth creating something you don't exactly know what the results can be if you're asking questions about what you're doing you don't exactly know what you're doing.

  • “Fraction of the speed of light…”

    I also walk at a fraction of the speed of light… also a snail travels at a fraction of the speed of light…

    this sentence didn’t have the significance that you were trying to make it have. I think what you meant to say was a “significant fraction of the speed of light. “

  • I can't stand the wet-lipped-narration. Irritates the hell out of me. I can't watch .. or listen to… any further @Seeker videos.

  • No men in the laboratory. you have to wait the black and white scenery to see them (50's). Wonder what happen since …

  • They call them “super heavies”? These scientists obviously have never visited a Mexican restaurant here in Central Texas…. rimshot!

  • I’m nowhere near a nuclear physicist, so to me it’s kind of surprising that scientists have an infinitely harder time creating elements as they go further down the periodic table. My layman brain believes it in many ways should be easier because the atomic nuclei are becoming larger and therefore should be more likely to collide in the accelerators.

  • Periodic table should exclusively comprise of naturally created elements was my thought. Writing this I realised that the universe has created some extreme momentary forces which could have created a plethora of unknown elements, even if only for a fracture of a second. Hmmmmm. . . .

  • "fraction of the speed of light" most over used, means nothing statement . guess what every one on earth is traveling at a fraction of the speed of light. small fraction , still a fraction. 1/64 th 63/64 th

  • naturally occurring, don't you mean, naturally occurred? it was there in the early stages of the big bang, but as time goes on they decay…

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *